By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent What Happened:A recent Vote Solar note on Nevada revealed that the industry has come roaring back after legislative fixes in 2017 cleaned up the mess that lawmakers and the Public Utilities Commission created in 2016.
By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent What Happened:A recent Vote Solar note on Nevada revealed that the industry has come roaring back after legislative fixes in 2017 cleaned up the mess that lawmakers and the Public Utilities Commission created in 2016.
Once state legislators stopped gambling with the future of solar in the state, Nevada's industry has come roaring back.[/caption]
SolarWakeup’s View: Well, better late than never, right?
After the Nevada Public Utilities Commission threw the state's solar market into disarray with its precipitous decision to eliminate net metering in 2016, the rooftop solar industry all but stopped in the state. National companies like Vivint, Sunrun and (then) SolarCity fled the market in protest.
Two years later, advocacy group Vote Solar says legislative fixes have helped the industry rebound and thrive once again.
(NV Energy's) SolarGenerations applications went from 287 in 2016 to 3,308 in 2017, with most applications coming in the second half of the year, after AB405 was signed into law. This represents an 11-fold year-over-year increase and early monthly data from 2018 indicates continued growth.Perhaps the best news from Vote Solar's note is the reports of significant hiring in a state that needs jobs. Here's what Larry Cohen, branch manager for Sunrun, a national solar installation firm with offices in Las Vegas, told Jackson:
Before the ink was dry on AB 405 - Nevada's landmark Solar Bill of Rights - I started rehiring dozens of our workers who I was forced to lay off just 18 months earlier because of anti-solar net metering changes. We hope legislators across the country look to Nevada and see that there is incredible voter demand for solar choice. All states should take strong steps to protect access to clean, affordable local energy.It's a great thing to see the state with some of the highest insolation rates in the country getting its act together again on solar. Other states should see Nevada's lost two years as a cautionary tale against changing solar policy recklessly without looking at all of the potential cosequences. Like I said, better late than never - but those are two years of growth that Nevada solar industry won't ever get back. And that's a shame. More: Nevada Solar Applications Through the Roof Following Passage of Net Metering Bill
By Nathan Arbitman, Contributor
By Nathan Arbitman, Contributor
Like many of you, I’ve committed my career to the cleantech industry because of the moral imperative to accelerate the clean energy revolution, as well as the unprecedented wealth creation opportunity this transformation brings. And I’m always asking myself, how we can make this transition happen even faster? Last December, my business, DSM Advanced Solar, announced the outcome of the latest SunRISE TechBridge Challenge, in which we partnered with a leading cleantech accelerator (Greentown Labs) and PV science institute (Fraunhofer CSE), to find and accelerate cutting-edge solar startups.First The Good News. In what could be the biggest solar news in a long time, California is going to require the 65,000 new homes per year in the State to include solar. This could mean between 200MW to 400MW of additional capacity per year of distributed generation that will save consumers money and lower the infrastructure investments that utilities have to do. There is a debate on the cost of the mandate, but as California becomes the 5th largest economy in the world you have to believe that they are doing something correctly.
Talking Heads In Solar. Hats off to Kelly Knutchen from California Solar & Storage Association for joining the 2 on 1 panel on CNBC. The moderator and think tank speaker were big on the mandate talking point. The think tanker clearly threw Kelly for a loop by asking how a homeowner is going to pay for solar upfront if they take a 30 year loan. huh? Watch the 4 minute interview and watch Kelly do a great job representing solar. This is part of the problem in the universe, CNBC still views solar as a subsidized energy source and never mentioned subsidies when covering oil, gas, or utilities.
Losing a NEM Battle. I am not used to writing about NEM battles we, as an industry lose. We lost, temporarily, in Nevada and settled in Arizona. Things in South Carolina looked bad, then good, then bad, now better. In most cases, we had a republican Governor pushing against our industry. I never expected Connecticut to be truly in play but when it comes down to it, solar is a political bargaining chip that Governors will use if they need to and you saw it in play here. After some late night chaos, because solar pros know how to play politics, the State House voted to gut net metering in CT. The question now is what political prize the legislators have to play and what message the Governor gets tainted with when he pitches his environmental bill. This also reminds us all that utilities will sponsor legislators of every size, shape and color to protect their ridiculous monopoly schemes.
Solar Knows No Parties. I don’t know if I buy into this but one study says solar is installed by republicans 5 times more often than democrats. What do you think? Frank’s coverage below.
Resi Solar. Are you a successful residential installer? Is your business growing? I am building out a small group of residential installers to help me keep a pulse on the market and identify the things that matter to you. Of course you will be recognized on the platform and we can enjoy getting to know each other. Let me know if you are interested in this informal advisory council.
Opinion
News
Opinions:
Have a great day!
Yann
By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent What Happened:A recent study by an outfit called Priceonomics reports that Republicans in California have installed more solar than Democrats.
By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent What Happened:A recent study by an outfit called Priceonomics reports that Republicans in California have installed more solar than Democrats.
SolarWakeup’s View: When you're deciding what conclusions you can draw from any given set of data, one of the first questions you should ask yourself is: "Is this data generalizable?" If not, it may not invalidate the study - but you should be hesitant about making any grand claims about it, either.
Such is the case with a study touted by Priceomomics, which reaches the conclusion that despite what you might think, Republicans install more solar than Democrats. OMG if true, right (not really, but you've already gone this far on the journey with me, so let's keep going)?
Well, the truth, as it often is, is far more complex and complicated than the study would have you believe. While the data is interesting, here are some cautions:
Our analysis shows that households’ decision to go solar is not driven by political affiliation. Instead, people who live in areas that are sunny, dry, and less dense tend to install solar panels at higher rates. And in California, the country’s top state for solar, that means you’re more likely to see solar panels in Republican bastions than Democratic strongholds.
