Pelosi, McCarthy Top Solar Representatives As SEIA Brings Its Summer Advocacy Blitz To A Close

By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

If there’s one thing Republicans and Democrats can agree on, it’s the increasing political power of solar energy. Just ask the more than 100 representatives the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) visited this summer during what it called its Summer Advocacy Blitz.

And solar is a bipartisan power source. After all, the representative with the most solar jobs in her district is none other than Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. And the representative with the most actual installed solar capacity in his district is Republican House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

Those two don’t agree on anything – but they’d be hard pressed to disagree about the importance of solar energy in California, where both of their districts reside.

[wds id=”3″]

As SEIA President and CEO Abigail Ross Hopper says:

Many Members of Congress do not know what a robust solar industry they have in their district, making this advocacy blitz to educate representatives and staff a critical step in continuing our industry’s growth across the country. We have long said that solar is a bipartisan economic engine and visiting the top 100 solar districts this summer was a clear indicator that that is the case.

That’s why SEIA spent its summer crisscrossing the country and visiting 107 House districts – those with the largest amount of solar in either jobs or installations – to explain to them the industry’s importance. The solar industry has long maintained it is a bipartisan issue, and Hopper and her team set out to prove it.

Exactly 107 congressional districts rank in the top 50 of one of these categories: total solar capacity, number of solar installations, solar jobs and solar companies. SEIA visited with 101 of these offices to educate members and staff about the robust solar businesses in their districts, and how policymakers can ensure continued job growth and investment.

The 107 congressional districts included in SEIA’s advocacy blitz are diverse with Republican (42) and Democratic (65) members.

SEIA’s blitz was a delightful show of political force from the solar industry’s advocacy agency, but they can’t do it alone (and it can’t be just a summer thing, either). It’s up to each of us to make it part of our daily lives to get politically involved and remind our representatives how important solar is to us – and them. Let’s keep the momentum going – and then vote like your livelihood depends on it, because it does.

C-PACE Financing Comes To Delaware, Opening New Financing Option For Commercial Clean Energy

By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing is one of the most successful mechanisms for funding clean energy improvements in commercial properties. It allows businesses and other commercial enterprises to make energy efficiency and renewable energy projects to their properties with no money up front. Instead, they pay off those investments through their property taxes.

Currently 35 states have C-PACE enabling legislation, and 20 have full-blown functioning programs.

What’s that? (Holds hand to ear.) I’m being told that number is now 36, after Delaware Governor John Carney signed Senate Bill 113 into law, enabling C-PACE financing in the state. The Delaware Sustainable Energy Utility (DESEU) will serve as the administrator of the PACE program.

[wds id=”3″]

The governor praised the efforts to bring this legislation to fruition:

By offering another method of financing for energy efficiency projects, PACE will help Delaware further our goals to improve economic development, lower energy costs and reduce greenhouse emissions.

PACENation, the national organization that advocates for PACE, reports that since 2009 more than $688 million has been invested in clean energy projects nationwide. They estimate that PACE projects have created 10,300 jobs, generated more than 6.3 million mWh of energy savings, and reduced CO2 emissions by more than 3.1 million metric tons (the equivalent of taking 657,000 cars off the road for one year.)

Tony DePrima, executive director of the DESEU said the next step in the process is designing the program. He hopes to have it up and running by the first quarter of 2019.

Sponsor of the bill in the House, State Representative Trey Paradee, praised the potential economic benefits of the legislation:

Delaware’s C-PACE legislation gives our counties a new tool to boost economic development and job growth. More clean energy projects in Delaware means lower energy bills for our businesses, more work for our local contractors, and more jobs in the clean energy sector.

Republicans v. Democrats: Who’s Installing More Solar?

By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

What Happened:A recent study by an outfit called Priceonomics reports that Republicans in California have installed more solar than Democrats.

  • While the study found that Republicans in the state have installed solar at a 5 to 1 ratio may surprise some, the study itself has some methodological flaws that make it impossible to generalize its findings beyond California.
  • It also has a couple of “Well, duh” conclusions, too.
  • study

    SolarWakeup’s View:  When you’re deciding what conclusions you can draw from any given set of data, one of the first questions you should ask yourself is: “Is this data generalizable?” If not, it may not invalidate the study – but you should be hesitant about making any grand claims about it, either.

    Such is the case with a study touted by Priceomomics, which reaches the conclusion that despite what you might think, Republicans install more solar than Democrats. OMG if true, right (not really, but you’ve already gone this far on the journey with me, so let’s keep going)?

    Well, the truth, as it often is, is far more complex and complicated than the study would have you believe. While the data is interesting, here are some cautions:

    [wds id=”3″]
  • Are CALIFORNIA Republicans really representative of Republicans across the country at this point? Isn’t it fair to say they are their own brand, much like California Solar & Storage Association is no longer associated with the national lobbying group? If so, it might make sense that there’s more solar in this group than is applicable across the country.
  • Solar used to be the province of the well-to-do. While that’s certainly changed in the past five years, it makes sense that those with more money have solar while those with less money do not. (Wait until community solar really takes off over the next five years and then call me.)
  • The idea that solar is a Republican or Democratic issue is a bit silly in any case, given that around nine out of every 10 Americans say they support more solar development.
  • And then there’s this:

    Our analysis shows that households’ decision to go solar is not driven by political affiliation. Instead, people who live in areas that are sunny, dry, and less dense tend to install solar panels at higher rates. And in California, the country’s top state for solar, that means you’re more likely to see solar panels in Republican bastions than Democratic strongholds.

    Really? That’s your conclusion? That’s a lot of words to spend on a conclusion I could have told you without doing a lick of study. I mean….for reals.

    One out of one authors of this piece say go ahead and read the study, but don’t leave your skepticism at its mother’s house, especially if you’re trying to spot national solar trends.

    More:

    Are Republicans or Democrats More Likely to Go Solar?

    Americans Tell Gallup: Develop More Solar, Please

    @DrVox On Climate Policy: “Go As Hard And Fast As Possible, Forever And Ever. Amen.”

    By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

    What Happened: I’ll tell you all what: David Roberts, aka Dr. Vox, knows how to capture your attention. Last I saw him, he was claiming battery storage had a “dirty secret,” about which we, well…you might say we disagreed. But he’s back, and this time I agree with him.

  • The key takeaway: “So the only rule of climate policy that really matters is: go as hard and fast as possible, forever and ever. Amen.” (As a retired Catholic, I couldn’t resist adjusting the punctuation a bit.)
  • In today’s piece, Dr. Vox discusses how humanity can save itself from the scourge of climate change with a four-point plan, followed aggressively.
  • Vox

    What our world will look like not that long from now (in the grand scheme of things) if we don’t attack climate change aggressively, like yesterday.

    SolarWakeup’s View:  Hey, when Dr. Vox is right, he’s right.

    David Roberts, also known by his Twitter handle @drvox, penned an overview article today on three recent studies on climate change and discussed ways humanity might save Earth from actually becoming the burnt-out hellscape so many people already think it is.

    First, Roberts dispenses with the idea that we can simply wait for carbon extraction technologies – technologies that will manage to capture carbon from the air and bury it – to become a thing. Right now, those technologies aren’t even in the infant stages, and we simply can’t wait. Failure, as they say, is not an option.

    [wds id=”3″]

    Here are the four strategies Roberts, based on his reading of three different studies, believes can help save Earth from the human race:

  • Radically increase energy efficiency.
  • Radically increase renewable energy. (obviously my personal favorite)
  • Electrify everything.
  • Then maybe some minor carbon capture work.
  • The whole piece is a fascinating read, but I can’t emphasize enough the most important part of Roberts’ article, the phrase all of us climate warriors should have tatooed on the inside of our left arm:

    “So the only rule of climate policy that really matters is: go as hard and fast as possible, forever and ever. Amen.”

    Amen.

    More:

    What genuine, no-bullshit ambition on climate change would look like

    Nice Headline, Doctor – But That Doesn’t Make It True