By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

Most solar observers who look at the Midwest and identify what state leads that group of states almost inevitably settle on Minnesota as the far-and-away leader. (Here's the obligatory note suggesting that Illinois is hot on Minnesota's tail and that it had better keep moving forward if it wants to remain the name on everyone's lips when it comes to a Midwestern solar leader). But the Land of 10,000 Lakes (which is actually closer to 15,000, but who's counting?) is well known for its progressive solar policy, particularly when it comes to community solar, where its reputation doesn't just make it stand out in the Midwest but in the entire country. And it benefits too from having a utility that, after long and involved battles, decided to join the Solar Revolution instead of fighting it. Xcel is now not only on board with solar development but in some cases is leading the charge (though it still isn't an enthusiastic supporter of rooftop solar, preferring instead the utility-scale and community solar farms that it has control over). Now there's even strong support for the expansion of solar power and other forms of renewable energy in the state as the latest study for the state's Department of Commerce suggests that the state could get up to 70% of its electricity by 2050 without destroying the state's economy. The Minneapolis Star Tribune has the details:

The deployment of more solar and wind generation would be no more costly than new natural gas power, a cheap source of electricity, according to the study done for the state Department of Commerce. Enough solar generation could be added cost-effectively by 2030 to meet Minnesota’s ambitious solar-power goals.

So that's great news for solar advocates in the state, some of whom have been pushing for a much more aggressive renewable portfolio standard for the past couple of years. Could this latest study add fuel to that fire and get it passed? Could Minnesota boldly join states like California and Hawaii and go all-in on 100% renewables? OK, maybe that last is a pipe dream for now, but the new study should buoy hope that Minnesota can stay on the Midwest's leading edge when it comes to solar development, at least for the foreseable future. More: Study says Minnesota can economically reach renewable energy goals by 2050

By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

New York has developed something of an inferiority complex about its renewable energy and storage market. They ceded leadership first to New Jersey, then Vermont (yes, VERMONT, of all places) and now Massachusetts gets the majority of headlines in the Northeast. So New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, no shy retiring flower himself, has made it his life mission to seize back the headlines from his fellow Northeastern states by setting aggressive goals for both renewable energy and storage growth - and he's not hesitant to tell anyone who is listening how fantastic his plan is going to be. And make no mistake, Cuomo's plan is ambitious, particularly for energy storage. Starting from zero, Cuomo has pledged to reach 1,500 MW of energy storage and put out a plan in June that would set a target at double that. But what Cuomo seems to forget is that the wheels of bureaucracy turn slowly and often painfully, and according to at least one company that desperately wants to participate in New York's energy storage boom is objecting to the rules as they are now in place, saying they make it impossible for third-party storage projects to compete. Our friends at Microgrid Knowledge have the details of GI Energy's complaints: Because third parties are unable to price their projects properly, they face an uneven playing field, GI Energy argues. "And, “perhaps most confounding of all,” GI Energy writes, utilities can deem their own energy storage projects as grid assets subject to no delivery bills while third party projects are treated as new retail accounts that are billed for delivery” — as if they were any other commercial behind the meter service. As a result, what could be the single biggest operating expense for energy storage developers remains undefined in New York, the filing states." How can third-party storage projects compete when they're not sure how much the utility is going to charge them for the delivery? No, we have no idea either. These and other rules are going to have to be hashed out right quick if New York is going to be any sort of significant player in the energy storage market, and New York is going to have to address complaints like those of GI Energy if they want to stay ahead of their Northeastern neighbors in this new race to the top. More: Barrier to Energy Storage in New York?

Let Mayors Help You. Mayors want to do big things because at the city level, big doesn’t take a lot. I’ve passed plenty of policy through the local council and that is where the solar industry should go more often. Let’s get some bright minds in solar together and draft the resolutions that are important in a State, take those resolutions and put them in your hands so that you can show it to your Mayor. Overnight, we’d be on the agenda for hundreds of municipalities and doing some important work at the local level. Solar permitting perhaps?
Be Aware Of Bad Solar. Florida will be ground zero for this, plenty of people want to make money overnight. Having spent the past 4 months talking to installers across the Country, I share their frustration about bad actors in solar because homeowners always call the right contractor after something has gone wrong. I don’t say this with bias, but you can tell a lot about a contractor by what type of solar mounting hardware they use. 
Let’s Make A Deal. Will folks in Arizona make a deal around an RPS type structure? I am surprised at the headline given how handily APS won the ballot amendment, I would have thought they would be entrenched in doing nothing. 
Alanis Would Be Proud. The irony is thick as the oil coming out of the ground. But when the land is available and the sun is shining, why not use solar energy to pull dead dinosaurs from the ground. Obviously add some energy storage to ensure top notch power quality and your solar power oil pump is ready to go!
Here We Go Again. Initial reports are coming in about the cause of the Camp Fire in Paradise, CA. The fire that has claimed more than 8,500 homes and 250 businesses. It has burned over 110,000 acres and is the deadliest fire in California history. According to those reports, power lines could be the reason that the fire initially started, a topic that was loudly debated in the California legislature this summer. 

Have a great day!

News

 

Have a great day!
Yann

By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

In light of other solar industry news on the policy side, it's easy to forget the hardware portion of the industry is still chugging along despite the obstacles put in front of them like tariffs and other chicanery by policymakers beholden to the fossil fuel interests. But innovations are still going on in the module market, including bifacial modules. Bifacial (literally: two faces) solar modules can generate energy not only from the front side, but from the back side as well. The sunlight on the ground is reflected to the glass-covered back side of the module, producing extra solar energy in a solar system, significantly reducing the solar system's levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), hence higher return on investment (ROI). Depending on the albedo (reflectivity) of the ground and other site conditions, daily energy yield for projects with bifacial modules can be 5-20% higher than with conventional polymer backsheet modules. This improved yield can dramatically enhance the economics of solar system deployments. Now one company is betting that these modules will become a major portion of the U.S. market - and they're intent on proving it by supplying a major Northwest project with their own spin on the new technology. Canadian Solar, one of the world's largest solar power companies, announced that the company has delivered 10 MW of Canadian Solar bifacial PV modules – BiKu CS3U-PB-AG – to Neighborhood Power for four solar power projects near Portland, Oregon. This represents the first significant delivery of bifacial solar PV modules into the United States. Neighborhood Power chose Canadian Solar bifacial modules because the additional energy gain is significant enough to compensate for the new tariffs on solar modules and steel mounting equipment, and the extra power gain made their solar projects economical again. "When the solar industry was hit with tariffs on solar modules and steel, it seemed that rising landed costs had priced these projects out of the market," said Stephen Gates, President, Neighborhood Power Corporation. "But with the additional power generated by Canadian Solar's bifacial modules, delivered in the quantities and in the timeframe we needed, we were able to make the project economics work and bring these projects online by the end of 2018 as planned." Canadian Solar BiKu bifacial modules are warranted for 30 years, 5 years longer than the industry standard, and have a lower degradation rate, which results in 20% additional yield over the lifetime of the solar module. When added to the additional daily bifacial yield of 5-20%, Canadian Solar BiKu bifacial modules deliver up to 44% additional lifetime value compared to conventional modules.