These are the top 10 most read solar articles by your peers this week!
News
The Top 10 is ranked by the number of SolarWakeup.com readers that clicked on the news article during the previous week. It is the poll of the most relevant solar news of the week as judged by your colleagues and competitors.
Have a great day!
Yann
This is your SolarWakeup for August 5th, 2016
I think we need to start pretending that there are two solar industries. One for Elon Musk and one for the rest of us. Of course I am kidding. I say this because most of us are driving each of our companies to focusing on a single segment of the value chain while Musk is seeking to bring Tesla/SolarCity to complete vertical integration. From modules to installation crews but now the inverter as well. In a solar only analysis, this seems strange because why build something that others do a great job of building for us at great prices. Instead, Tesla sees itself has a wireless grid company and the inverter is an important brain center for this. So while Tesla builds a solar inverter, do you think this is the right path?
News
Opinions:
Have a great day!
Yann
This is your SolarWakeup for August 4th, 2016
Back in 2006-2008, RPS legislation was going around the Country but for solar they were not enough. The RPS laws often had a push for a solar carve out so that solar could find its piece within the rule. Those standards gave us the NJ and MA markets amongst others. Seems to me that energy storage is going through a similar process. It sounds cliché but storage is 10 years behind solar with a potential growth trigger that relates the two sectors. Like Germany, which doesn’t have net metering, the US attempt to get off net metering and into time of use rate design, the storage sector can ‘trick’ the shift into a box that takes homes off the grid. I’d love to hear from you all about how you are looking at storage and how it intersects your business.
News
Opinions:
Have a great day!
Yann
This is your SolarWakeup for August 3rd, 2016
In a few weeks it will have been 4 years since I sent the very first SolarWakeup newsletter to about 350 of you, now it’s the widest read daily newsletter in the industry. What has been a volatile policy and innovation environment has given me plenty to talk about each morning. Now that we have over 250 thousand solar professionals, there is more to talk about and more content to bring you. In the next few weeks and months you will see more media from SolarWakeup, in the form of audio and video, starting with the podcast series you can find on the homepage (to the right) with correspondent Frank Andorka. Soon, I will soon start video interviews primarily focused on solar startups and other innovators shaking up our sector. There are many exciting interviews already in the works and I hope you join me in the excitement about this addition to the platform.
News
Opinions:
Have a great day!
Yann
This is your SolarWakeup for August 2nd, 2016
Pending a shareholder vote and approval from regulators, SolarCity will become Tesla Solar, or at least part of Tesla. Solar power has always been part of the complete sustainability picture for Elon Musk and letting the nuances of a solar balance sheet stop that goal wasn’t going to happen. SolarCity also preannounced better than expected install numbers for Q2 and lowered guidance for 2016 to 900-1000MW. While lower than expected, let that settle in for a second. 1GW, of solar, primarily on households is a boatload of solar energy. The Silevo modules are now shown in a picture and expect them to be at 22% or about 350W which should help with MW goals given that Wall Street doesn’t understand efficiencies. The worry for the solar industry continues, Trina is going private and some wondered why Tesla was stepping in for SolarCity. Sunrun CEO, Lynn Jurich, blogged about the great deal Tesla is getting, perhaps in the hopes of getting her own deal for Sunrun?
News
Opinions:
Have a great day!
Yann
This is your SolarWakeup for August 1st, 2016
Assume for the moment that over the next few years, that utilities and solar come together and negotiate something in the center. Something between full retail rate net metering and no net metering at all. You could foresee something along the lines of a minimum bill, time of use pricing and non-bypassable charges. NARUC, the association of regulatory commissioners, is writing a manual about good rate design. I’d be interested to see the lobbying and education that the solar sector is doing for this manual. Not because it will become ‘law’ but because things like this can be used as tool if the manual is particularly friendly to incumbents. What I am trying to say is that little things matter and the foreseeable future requires that we lead on crafting the tools going forward.
News
Opinions:
Have a great day!
Yann
These are the top 10 most read solar articles by your peers this week!
News
The Top 10 is ranked by the number of SolarWakeup.com readers that clicked on the news article during the previous week. It is the poll of the most relevant solar news of the week as judged by your colleagues and competitors.
Have a great day!
Yann
This is your SolarWakeup for July 29th, 2016
How many times have legislators said that solar must compete on price. Not based on an RPS or carbon price or special carve outs. Now that solar costs have dropped 90% over 10 years and is doubling in market every year and a half, it’s normal for incumbent market participants to push back. Nuclear provides some important base load but let me be clear that power in open markets needs to be priced with market dynamic pricing. If the grid needs the baseload power that nuclear provides than the costs should reflect that. That pricing dynamic will undoubtedly cause more storage to be put in place because solar plus storage is renewable nuclear fusion bottled into a battery. The timing is right because in a few years, the storage sector would have policy staff that would make this exact case but that investment is not yet in the cards. So in the meantime, utilities will get what they can to keep the assets from being stranded.
News
Opinions:
Have a great day!
Yann
This is your SolarWakeup for July 28th, 2016
Packed news day so make sure you keep up. To recap the story we talked about yesterday in the NY Times. I spoke with dozens of you about how this happened and while the article may have been strong in its wording the issue is based on the timeframe and the peak times are starting later in the afternoon. As solar companies pull back the policy fight and trade associations lack desire to get into the fight, these things will happen. More importantly policy and PR are related and it is VERY telling that no solar company was quoted in the story. Speaking of policy, look at the story about Nevada. The solar industry sometimes thinks we can negotiate from a position of pleasure in the middle. That fighting the fight isn’t ugly and getting rid of a single person can fix the issue. Well, you are wrong and now you have proof. NV Energy and the anti-solar commissioners are now attacking the other players in the fight to bring solar back to Nevada. Don’t get pitched by what people are selling without understanding their motive, that’s my message for reporters in solar today.
News
Opinions:
Have a great day!
Yann
This is your SolarWakeup for July 27th, 2016
A few notes for you this morning. Hemlock, after winning a summary judgement over SolarWorld, has submitted the financial claims. The losses amount to over $793million which is far more than the cash on the balance sheet of the module manufacturer. The question is, will the brazen CEO fight more, ask for another bailout from Qatar or make a deal to drop the trade cases in US and China. This is a simplified version but a deal should be possible at this point. On another note, please take a moment to read and discuss the NY Times story. I don’t have all of the details yet, but I am fairly sure that the information listed in the story is either wrong or severely misleading. It may be possible that the homeowner was in a specific rate schedule from the start that was changed but the NEM 1.0 policies did not change in CA and the NEM 2.0 policies still offer a significant benefit to CA homeowners, especially in PG&E territory. Someone pitched this to NY Times and we should all be concerned about how they were able to push this story on a great reporter.
News
Opinions:
Have a great day!
Yann