E036: Reverse Q&A With Yann Brandt, Live From SolarWakeup Live! New York

What: Reverse Q&A With Yann Brandt, Live From SolarWakeup Live! New York


Summary: By popular demand, the audience of SolarWakeup Live! asked me the questions during this panel. Topics included the impact of 201, what is next for solar, the future of solar advocacy and how to increase the feedback loop with SolarWakeup readers.

SolarWakeup View: Listen to the podcast to hear the SolarWakeup View.

SolarWakeup Contributor: As They Sowed, So Shall We Reap

By Tony Clifford

The latest numbers from The Solar Foundation’s National Solar Jobs Census didn’t surprise me, but they certainly put me in a bad mood.

9,800.

That’s the number of solar workers who had jobs at the end of 2016 who, as the calendar settles in to 2018, no longer have them—and that number is only the beginning of an avalanche of job losses that will result from the mystifying decision to impose tariffs on imported solar modules because two foreign-owned companies couldn’t compete.

Suniva and SolarWorld.

Remember those names when you’re planning your next project. Those are the two companies that cost the solar industry nearly 10,000 jobs as clearly as if they’d handed out the pink slips themselves.

In the fantasy world only SolarWorld and Suniva inhabited, the tariffs wouldn’t destroy jobs, they’d grow jobs. They’d protect jobs. They’d be the beginning of an unending solar boom. And some people, including the president believed them.

But SolarWorld and Suniva were never in this for you. They were always in this for themselves. And their executives are unethical, not ignorant.

They were fully aware of what tariffs would do to the U.S. solar industry, but their aim was to get their foreign owners more value in bankruptcy, playing with your livelihoods like they were so many chips in a poker game.

While the Trump tariff was not announced until January 2018, uncertainty over the trade case was the primary factor that caused the 3.8% decrease in the number of American solar jobs. The trade case, filed last April by the two shameless charlatans named above, forced many solar firms (including Standard Solar) to reconsider their 2017 hiring plans.

The solar industry expected slower growth in 2017 because of the record number of megawatts installed in 2016 as a result of the (previous) uncertainty engendered by the battle over the investment tax credit (a crisis that, while averted, caused 2016 to be an explosive year for solar growth that couldn’t be repeated immediately).

But let’s look at hard numbers: Between 2012 and 2016, the average year-to-year growth in solar jobs was more than 20% annually. Everyone expected that rate of growth to slow, but no one—not even the most pessimistic of analysts—expected an actual loss of jobs. No one expected that prior to April.

Then what history will call “the Section 201 trade case” happened, and all bets were off. We pleaded, the Solar Energy Industries Association pleaded, nearly every sane voice in the industry screamed at the top of their lungs that tariffs would result in job losses. The final estimate was 23,000 in 2018 alone. And we’re reaping the whirlwind of the “Trump tariff” that was sown in the hot air and empty promises made by the two petitioners.

My biggest worry is that the solar industry has yet to see the worst impacts of the Trump tariff. We are already beginning to hear about pending layoffs, especially in companies heavily involved in the utility-scale sector. A disturbing note in the Solar Foundation report is that “jobs went up in 29 states with emerging solar markets.”

These states—Texas and much of the southeast and Midwest—are the states that were just becoming cost-competitive in the previous two years. The increasing cost of solar modules as a result of the Trump tariff will devastate solar development in these states—and others—in 2018 and beyond. My stomach is in knots at the thought of what these already depressing numbers will metastasize into in next year’s report.

This is what happens when you have a president who inexplicably allows the interests of two foreign-owned companies to hold the American solar industry hostage, creating volatility and uncertainty in a market that needed steadiness. So, although nothing can destroy the solar industry, these Trump tariff wounds are going to take time to heal—time many of the displaced workers don’t have.

Tony Clifford is the CDO of Standard Solar and member of the SEIA Board of Directors

E035: Blockchain and Solar In Power Markets With LO3 Energy and Nat’l Grid, SolarWakeup Live! New York

What: Interview with LO3 Energy And National Grid On The Use Of Blockchain In The Future Energy Market

Summary: Blockchain is a decentralized ledger technology driven to publicity by cryptocurrencies. In this conversation recorded at SolarWakeup Live! New York, Yann speaks with Lawrence Orsini, CEO of LO3 Energy, and Mathew Sachs from National Grid.

SolarWakeup View: Blockchain is a new and early concept to the solar market. The Brooklyn microgrid is a pilot project that uses the concept of blockchain within an existing power marketplace. Overproduction of solar generation is delivered in power market credits to willing buyers. It can be sketched out how a distributed ledger within the blockchain can be the de-regulated version of net metering, matching overproduction with other energy consumers without having to have people in the middle of it.

Related:

Brooklyn Microgrid

Subscribe to EnergyWakeup

This is your SolarWakeup for January 29th, 2018

201 Recap. Last week we learned about the 201 tariffs from Trump and SolarWakeup quickly held a conference call for our readers. That call is now available online for you to review. This week, I head to New York for our third SolarWakeup Live. We will hear about community solar, blockchain, energy storage, REV and investments in New York. I also have an unannounced guest that was inside the room during 201 tariff discussions fighting for the solar industry every step of the way. If you are in the area, don’t miss the event the solar industry is calling the most important gathering in America.

Congrats. Oliver Crane has made it to Antigua. Catch the livestream on the ‘Atlantic Campaigns’ facebook page. It was pretty cool so it gets the double mention. A big thanks from all of you that donated and shared his donation page.

SunPower Hits Back. The stop and go portion of the 201 tariff has already caused job losses in solar, we’ve been saying that since the start. Since the announcement of the tariff, it has been more of the same with the press release, proclamation and annexes all coming separately. Then we waited for the exemption process and hinting at a path to global settlements. SunPower was adamant about their differentiation during the USITC hearings and filings. Their position was that the IBC technology is just as different as First Solar’s CdTe solution which was exempted. SunPower is now stopping a $20million investment and hiring plan until they find out if their exemption request comes out. The interesting subplot is that if Suniva had been run properly from the start, taking on SunPower’s dealer network would have worked. Instead they were greedy and focused on the SolarCity/Sunruns of the market and promptly screwed up customer service when they changed their supply chain software solution. I hope for the sake of SunPower, their employees and dealers that they get the exemption.

South Korea Files With WTO. This is unlikely to be the first WTO filing by a country affected by the tariff. The political ramifications elude me unless the politics are better at putting issues into silos than I thought. It may also provide an inside look on if the tariffs hold up at the WTO.

Red State Pushback. Tom Matzzie highlights the interesting ‘policy by press release’ result of the 201 tariffs. The jobs that will be lost, in large part, come in the form of lost jobs in the future; i.e. growth of market that will not occur. Many of those projects are in the Trump States that wanted better paying blue collar jobs. The political challenge now is to use this issue as a way to show the tangible economic opportunity presented by solar and win an election fighting for solar to grow. The 201 tariff is both anti-growth and wage suppressing while costing taxpayers half a billion dollars.

Presented By Pfister Energy – Your only source for turnkey design-build renewable energy system solutions. We provide world-class power solutions for the commercial, industrial, and utility sectors with an emphasis on energy efficiency and energy management. Visit us at www.pfisterenergy.com

Opinion

Have a great day!

Yann